This theory is now generally accepted, but as far as the introduction of Kojiki is strictly read, even though the work for making the history book was done both with Teiki and Kyuji, Kojiki itself is supposed to have only Kyuji from Teiki and Kyuji in its contents. |
この説は現時点で通説になっているといえるが、古事記の序文を厳密に読む限りでは、史書作成のための作業は帝紀及び旧辞の両方に対して行われたものの、古事記自体は帝紀及び旧辞のうち旧辞のみをその内容とするはずのものである。 |